Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Many WP:NOTNEWS and WP:TRIVIA addition as the tournament is set to begin tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio 10:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of reverts. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 11:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been the subject of frequent COI editing and possibly sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Joslyn Rose Lyons for initial incident report. Kylemahar902 (talk) 17:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Banned editor User:DooksFoley147 has been using IPs from Ireland to evade their ban. The page Oasis discography needs the same protection. Binksternet (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS per BLPGROUP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs have been repeatedly (for months) adding names of characters for upcoming films without any source to backup hence WP:CRYSTALBALL. Some of the diff [1] [2] [3] [4]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism - Here I have another IP that persists in placing the alternative logo of the Paramount+ streaming service in the infobox website again. 190.167.44.65 (talk) 22:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Gulf of America. Leonidlednev (TCL) 23:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cross-wiki spam Phương Linh (thảo luận) 23:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently frustrated user turned to outright vandalising the article after their apparently AI-generated revisions got reverted. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. User started vandalizing other articles but has stopped for now. I gave the final warning. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP users constantly adding unsourced claims into the article. Sricsi (talk) 00:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP and Sockpuppet vandalism. Trekkie49 (talk) 00:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Left CTOPS notice on talk Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeatedly vandalized by IP users with the same string of text every time. Out of 20 edits in the past 6 months, 6 have been vandalism. Prakashs27 (talk) 01:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under IPA. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:19, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one month., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is the ICC LTA. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP and new editor vandalism that has spun into threats against me when I warn the IPs and new editors. Anwegmann (talk) 04:17, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP and new editor vandalism despite internal note instructing against the specific repeated edit. Anwegmann (talk) 04:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions by IPs. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Change section header:

    "Gulf of America"

    to:

    "Gulf of America"

    so that the redirect to the section still works (I can't edit either the page nor the redirect). Or the redirect can change from #REDIRECT [[Gulf of Mexico#Gulf of America]] to #REDIRECT [[Gulf of Mexico#"Gulf of America"]] (although I am unsure if that works). Altendo 16:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    It looks like this has already been fixed (the double quote marks have been removed from the header, and someone added an anchor without quote marks to the heading beforehand). — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Forced to do some rewriting, lest the bot run amok. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Requesting immediate archiving... * Pppery * it has begun... 04:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.